Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (184365)	10/28/2006 9:51:28 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793727

Limbaugh's comment is about 0.1 I understand that. I understand most of the points you have made in the process of not answering my question, which was why it matters to Limbaugh and others who are questioning about whether Fox was acting and/or off his meds. If it was just a random observation that popped out in Limbaugh's rant process, no more significant than questioning the color tie Fox wore, or a gratuitous attack with no point other than it was a handy target of a scattergun approach, I could understand that. What I can't understand is the implied wrong in acting or going off one's meds to display the full burden of Parkinson's rather than displaying a lipsticked burden.