Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AuBug who wrote (23772)	10/29/2006 12:15:15 AM
From: John McCarthy	Respond to of 78408

Hi DJE I can't bring any new insight and in fact (you should be aware) I'm probably one of the dumbest (or the dumbest) poster here .... -0- mining knowlege (sorry if that makes you flinch) nonetheless ..... auq.v is exactly what I am lookin for .... just so you know and not pumpin .... my firing order is ..... (1) get another 20k goz.v and that brings me to 60k and thats done ... (2) koan likes to make me crazy with zinc stocks (I hate him! <g>) ... so I gotta track down his recent thingie this coming week .... (3) auq.v would be another 60,000 share buy on my part some thoughts .... (and you may not like them but its what I think - recall what I posted at the top of this) (a) not certain folks will pay attention to 20k annual production - and I am thankful for that (b) if your right and they actually have production on the books by 2/1/07 - yippe (c) we both know they will resource up over time -while- cranking out production .... (d) when gold goes boom and we are already sittin there with production ... thats the sweet spot .... (e) I could see me in this for at least 2 years .... because you gotta keep 1 eye on the tax man .... In closing, I really thank you for taking the time to post what you did. I have read the pdf file twice and its just a good spot to be in .... I would hope to have all 60k shares before that press release. regards, John

To: AuBug who wrote (23772)	11/5/2006 3:09:41 PM
From: baystock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78408

>They do a comparison to the market value of 8 gold producers and come up with a c$3.60 price for AUQ.v based on 600,000 equity oz gold.< That is either a bad joke or a fraud for AUQ to assert that a micro producer will get the same valuation as an intermediate producer. Who in their right mind would pay US$160 million for just 600,000 oz of recoverable gold ? Why stop at comparing themselves to intermediate producers, why not compare themselves to an American Barrick on a per oz basis ? Aurogin's CEO use to be the CEO of Geomaque resources which was a big disappointment despite similar low cost claims for their mines in Central America.