Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (207315)	10/30/2006 10:03:35 AM
From: sylvester80	Respond to of 281500

NEWS: Britain seeks ‘bold’ global warming action. Report by senior economist says it's cheaper to fight than let it happen MSNBC News Services URL: msnbc.msn.com Updated: 7:18 a.m. MT Oct 30, 2006 LONDON - Unchecked global warming will devastate the global economy on the scale of the world wars and the Great Depression, according to a major British report released Monday that seeks to quantify the costs and benefits of action as well as inaction. British Treasury chief Gordon Brown, who commissioned the report and who could very well become Britain's next prime minister when Tony Blair steps down next year, said former U.S. Vice President Al Gore, who has dedicated himself to warning about global warming, would advise the British government on climate change. Introducing the report, Blair said unabated climate change would eventually cost the world between 5 percent and 20 percent of global gross domestic product each year. He called for “bold and decisive action” to cut carbon dioxide emissions and stem the worst of the temperature rise. And Blair called the report “the most important document on the future” that he had read since becoming prime minister. Pressure on Bush administration? The report is expected to increase pressure on the Bush administration — which never approved the Kyoto Protocol climate accord — to step up its efforts to fight global warming. Report author Sir Nicholas Stern, a senior government economist and former chief economist of the World Bank, said that acting now to cut greenhouse gas emissions would cost about 1 percent of global GDP each year. “The evidence shows that ignoring climate change will eventually damage economic growth,” said Stern’s 700-page report. “Our actions over the coming decades could create risks of major disruption to economic and social activity, later in this century and in the next, on a scale similar to those associated with the great wars and the economic depression of the first half of the 20th century,” Stern added. Blair said the report had “done a crucial job. It has demolished the last remaining argument for inaction in the face of climate change.” ‘Consequences ... are literally disastrous’ Blair emphasized that the scientific community agrees that the world is warming, and that greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels are largely to blame. “It is not in doubt that if the science is right, the consequences for our planet are literally disastrous,” he said. “This disaster is not set to happen in some science fiction future many years ahead, but in our lifetime.” “Unless we act now ... these consequences, disastrous as they are, will be irreversible,” he added. Stern said the world must shift to a “low-carbon global economy” through measures including taxation, regulation of greenhouse gas emissions and carbon dioxide emission trading. Brown said harnessing the power of markets through a global carbon trading system was one of the best strategies. Sharing a platform with Blair and Stern, Brown proposed a new European Union target for emissions reductions of 30 percent by 2020 and 60 percent by 2050, and expansion of an existing carbon trading system to cover more than half of emissions. Brown wants the EU warming strategy, which sets overall limits for carbon emissions but then allows businesses to trade their quotas, to be linked with Australia, California, Japan, Norway and Switzerland so as to set a global carbon price that fixes a clear cost for emissions. California is among a few states going around the Bush administration to push for trading. Kyoto status report The long-awaited report precedes U.N. climate talks, starting in Nairobi, Kenya, on Nov. 6, focusing on finding a successor to Kyoto, which ends in 2012. Under the 1997 Kyoto accord, 35 industrialized nations committed to reducing emissions by an average 5 percent below 1990 levels by 2012. But emissions by industrialised nations rose in 2004 to the highest levels since the early 1990s, the U.N. climate change secretariat said Monday. Britain is one of only a handful of industrialized nations whose greenhouse gas emissions have fallen in that time. Overall, there was a 2.4 percent rise in emissions by 41 industrialized countries. Brown said Britain would lead the international effort against climate change, establishing “an economy that is both pro-growth and pro-green.” The British government is also considering new “green taxes” on cheap airline flights, fuel and high-emission vehicles. The Stern report is online at www.pm.gov.uk/output/Page10298.asp. The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report. URL: msnbc.msn.com

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (207315)	10/30/2006 10:51:02 AM
From: Noel de Leon	Respond to of 281500

"The theory is named after American geophysicist Marion King Hubbert, who created a model of known oil reserves, and proposed, in a paper he presented to the American Petroleum Institute in 1956 [3], that production of oil from conventional sources would peak in the continental United States between 1965 and 1970, and worldwide within "about half a century" from publication." Hubbert was ridiculed after he published the 1956 paper by those infected with the "Pooh-Pooh" gene("almost everyone inside and outside the oil industry") up to 1970 when US production started to fall. That gene seems to infect fewer and fewer today although it has not been eradicated. A similar genetic effect can be found in those that insist that "intelligent" design is a scientific theory.