Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : YEEHAW CANDIDATES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jibacoa who wrote (19946)	10/30/2006 11:27:35 AM
From: Ken W	Respond to of 23958

Bernard "I take it that you don't think the Sept. 12 upgap is of any concern.<g>" That gap is way below the major moving averages Bernard therefore is not a signifcant concern at this point. If I was expecting some fluke in earnings or if the gap were nearer to a moving average then I'd keep an eye on it. The company seems to be pretty straight forward in their press, explaining the non-cash charge and that they expect to be profit positive for this Q...making it three in a row. I think the insider selling was option related and not for any sinister reason. Personally, I wish they would do away with options altogether and just pay people it would take a lot of the o my god factor out of investing. Ken