Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JBTFD who wrote (3749)	10/30/2006 1:19:36 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 10087

That's rather odd phrasing. Taking it literally it would be very simple to give you an answer. Any regulation that didn't cause harm or reduce the standards would qualify, so a regulation that had nothing to do with the environment would be your answer. Mark, very few of Bush's regulatory changes did "decay the standards". It might be more useful for you to post some examples of where this was the case. There are probably some, but such actions are not typical of this administration. As for new environmental regulations or laws that don't loosen standards, just google - EPA tightens regulation - and you will find things like this - steelnews.com casperstartribune.net usatoday.com eetimes.com legalminds.lp.findlaw.com