Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PROLIFE who wrote (752802)	10/30/2006 6:13:43 PM
From: pompsander	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

No your response was to post links that went into lengthy arguments about the stem cell debate. I saw nothing in any of the links that supported your statemetn that passing the amendment would create a "constitutional right to cloning". It is this statement I am trying to understand, as the proposed amendment has a specific ban on cloning or sale of human reproductive elements. I have expressed one possible explanation of your argument...the this is a "constitutional" amendment in Missouri and perhaps if the federal guidelines somehow allowed cloning, this could then be considered a constitutional right? Doesn't work for me, but I would like to hear your arguments.