Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Threshold who wrote (308250)	10/30/2006 7:33:03 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573922

it'll take a lot to beat the republicans sending out the message that republicans vote on tuesday and democrats vote on wednesday...

To: Threshold who wrote (308250)	10/30/2006 8:01:39 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 1573922

What could Kerry have done about the stolen election? The evidence of the massive election fraud came out gradually oiver the next year or two. The day after the election you are on the spot, you either have to concede or you have to file a lawsuit and had some solid evidence to back it up. I am sick and tired of people blaming Kerry for being cheated. Sure, hindsight is 20-20. If he had known ahead of time he could have made his whole campaign about Bush cheating in the near future. But unfortunately Kerry is a not a precog.

To: Threshold who wrote (308250)	10/30/2006 11:21:15 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1573922

Great let's string the GOP up by the short hairs. The whole world knows that they are toxic. But WTF did Kerry do about the stolen election? Nothing. He rolled over like a good Elite lapdog and faded into oblivion. The guy may have been some sort of war hero, but he's a coward now. You make a good point. I think its more appropriately directed at Gore and the Florida fiasco but Kerry only made a feeble attempt to investigate claims of voter fraud in Ohio. You Dem worshippers need to find someone with the balls to stand up to Bushco and the elites running the show. So far all you have is Hillary, and what a f'n disaster that would be if she became President. Y'all should have learned from electing a second bush, but you haven't, not even close. Never give one family that kind of power. Speaking of which, do you have people in Canada who will stand up to PM Harper. He is sounding more and more like Bush: "It is inherently dangerous to allow a country such as Iraq to retain weapons of mass destruction, particularly in light of its past aggressive behaviour. If the world community fails to disarm Iraq, we fear that other rogue states will be encouraged to believe that they too can have these most deadly of weapons to systematically defy international resolutions and that the world will do nothing to stop them." - Stephen Harper supporting the American invasion of Iraq, House of Commons, notacolony.ca Do the conservatives control both houses of Canada's Parliament like the conservatives control Congress? I understand that Harper is getting increasingly heavy handed......do you think Canadian liberals will stand up to him? What if he tries to censor them like the Bush administration tried to censor liberals here in the US? There's a saying.....don't judge someone until you've walked in their shoes. Something to think about.........