SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito who wrote (52810)11/2/2006 10:11:30 PM
From: ManyMoose  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
I think Sully's challenge is well-formed and legitimate.

Why don't you answer it?

I'm just going to decline to play the game.



To: Cogito who wrote (52810)11/3/2006 12:58:44 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90947
 
What is inherently biased about my conditions? My assertions about the WAPO smear of Allen over "macaca" are based on an objective review of the alleged offense. The WAPO engaged in a massive front page assault for months. In the end they weren't able to prove any of the alleged charges. In the process thay employed every dirty journalistic trick in the book (ignoring all manner of conrtary evidence that ran against their pre-determined story line, unnamed sources, unsubstantiated rumors, false allegations made by leftist partisans, one sided reporting [always from the left] etc., ad nauseam)..

You claimed that the MSM has slammed dems in the press, ET AL. You even falsely claimed that the Swift Boat Vets got massive favorable coverage that harmed Kerry. You obviously implied there is no liberal MSM bias (or that there is equal bias/bad reporting both ways).

I adamantly disagreed based on overwhelming evidence to the contrary. I even linked you to a nice sample.

So if you're right, you should be able to easily cite one instance that is as bad or worse than the massive WAPO smear of Allen over "macaca".