Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TideGlider who wrote (8067)	11/3/2006 11:30:04 AM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224737

Again, the Acorn thing is trivial and doesn't effect election results, as detailed in the recent headline article and nation-wide study. Want to know how you affect elections? The way Rove does it. Hire a GOP consulting company to go through the voter rolls and liberally remove anyone who sounds like they might be black, using excuses like "they have the same name as an ex-con in Texas". Then after the election claim you made a "mistake". 57,700 such names were removed before the Florida 2000 race, which was a much bigger factor than all the hanging chads. This was also done in Ohio 2004, but then they also had the Diebold machines, some of which reversed results, meaning all Kerry votes turned into Bush votes. Some precincts reported more Bush votes than there were registered voters. Evangelical strongholds reported 97% turnout and voting for Bush, while some black districts reported only 7% turnout. And in black and liberal college areas, voting machines were denied, making it up to an 8 hour wait to vote, while in GOP districts no wait whatsoever. That's how they stole it. And a few other ways like those anonymous letters to minority voters telling them they weren't legal.