SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (23731)11/3/2006 9:10:26 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
NY Times: Iraq Within A Year Of Building Bomb In 2002

By SG on Media Bias
Sweetness & Light

A seemingly inadvertent admission from the "Paper Of Treason," the New York Times:

<< U.S. Web Archive Is Said to Reveal a Nuclear Guide >>



Read it all here
sweetness-light.com



To: Sully- who wrote (23731)11/3/2006 10:55:30 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
This from Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit
    Judging from some of the delighted emails I'm getting, I 
need to warn people not to get too carried away -- this
doesn't say that Saddam would have had a bomb in 2004. But
it does say that he had all the knowledge needed to have a
bomb in short order. And as we know he was looking to
reconstitute his program once sanctions were ended
-- and
that sanctions were breaking down in 2003 -- that's pretty
significant. However, perhaps even more significant, given
that we knew most of the above already, is that the NYT
apparently regards the documents that bloggers have been
translating for months as reliable, which means that
reports of Iraqi intelligence's relations with Osama bin
Laden, and "friendly" Western press agencies, are
presumably also reliable.

http://instapundit.com/archives/033723.php