Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (308973)	11/5/2006 5:19:09 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572711

I've gotten liberals to defend Castro, Saddam, and others in the past. Oswald is easy.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (308973)	11/23/2006 5:57:17 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572711

Oswald clearly said he didn't shoot anyone and was a patsy. He was marched out in public soon after (a huge security violation) to be shot, killed and silenced. The public never got to hear Oswald's testimony. In fact, it is highly likely Oswald was telling the truth, that he was set up and framed instead of the professional assasins who did the deed. The Zupruder film clearly shows JFK hit by two shots within two seconds. An amateur marksman like Oswald would have had to have been the "luckiest" shooter alive to have made those killshots so quickly. Viewing him as the lone assassin defies all common sense. Plus, he had no motive. Also, the Warren Commission clearly covered up a lot of evidence and several eye-witnesses were killed soon after or died of mysterious accidents. Bottomline, the rightwing did it. Hoover and the black ops wing of the CIA who believed in BS like this. en.wikipedia.org