Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (3364)	11/5/2006 11:58:55 AM
From: loantech	Respond to of 50502

Faber is good but he flip flops about every 3-6 months on gold etc. Going from memory only it is the 1st thing to go though. <g> Like Saville and others even here he is excellent at fence riding.

To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (3364)	11/5/2006 1:02:51 PM
From: wsw1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50502

whether or not the us dollar collapses at this juncture is irrelevant... the overall trend is down, meaning gold's overall trend is up...

To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (3364)	11/5/2006 1:24:29 PM
From: Cactus Jack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50502

SOTB, Re: Jim Rogers: 5. His original and honest opinion on the commodity cycle and China -- is correct. But, sadly many of you have seemingly forgotten it? Do you really want to know what Jimmy Rogers thinks about China & Commodities? Are you sure you really want to hear the Truth? Or, will you have your eyes, ears & mouths covered to the truth? I've read plenty on Rogers' opinions on China and commodities, and he continues to preach that the commodities bull has at least 10 years remaining. What am I missing here? With my eyes and ears open, you're being cryptic on this. I'm not trying to defend Rogers, I'm just looking to see where (and if) you agree or disagree with him. If you don't want to answer, that's fine. jpg