SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jttmab who wrote (207811)11/6/2006 8:27:39 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Wow; I had the first post of the day over there. Let's see what I get back.



To: jttmab who wrote (207811)11/6/2006 10:11:52 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
This could open a can of worms ... if oil companies actually purchase the oil and the oil is set at market price that would suggest that the SPR is making [or can make] a profit.

I don't see the SPR making a profit as a bad thing. If it makes a profit it means it is buying when oil is cheaper/more available, and selling when supplies are tighter. Seems to be good all around to me.

Of course it can also make a loss, which not only looses money for the treasury, but also means your taking oil off the market when its more expensive and putting it back on when its cheaper, which would tend to make the price swings more extreme.



To: jttmab who wrote (207811)11/8/2006 12:01:22 PM
From: bearshark  Respond to of 281500
 
I haven't been following your notes carefully. I apologize if you have your answers.

Here is the Katrina "Notice of Sale." It may have the standard clauses in it which would probably appear in the contracts. That may answer your questions.

fossil.energy.gov