SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PROLIFE who wrote (14375)11/6/2006 9:57:35 AM
From: Mr. Palau  Respond to of 71588
 
"In Praise of Barney Frank

By TChris, Section Elections 2006
Posted on Mon Nov 06, 2006 at 08:21:06 AM EST

As Democrats are poised to take control of the House (and perhaps the Senate), some business leaders are saying things like this:

"Barney Frank is fair, he's smart, and he's focused," says former Representative Steve Bartlett (R-Tex.), now CEO of the Financial Services Roundtable. "That's the kind of leadership we need."
Business Week reassures its readers that Democrats are not hostile to business (or, the article implies, to corporate lobbyists). Democrats will, however, take oversight of multinational corporations a bit more seriously than the Republicans did:

Of course, even a more conciliatory approach probably won't deter Democrats from convening oversight hearings to target certain industries with close ties to the Bush White House -- particularly energy, pharmaceuticals, insurance, and defense."



To: PROLIFE who wrote (14375)11/7/2006 5:18:13 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Respond to of 71588
 
BY JAMES TARANTO
Tuesday, November 7, 2006 2:28 p.m. EST

'D' Is for Defeat
John "Botched Joke" Kerry resurfaced late yesterday with an email appeal to Democratic loyalists (despite being strictly nonpartisan, we're on the list for informational purposes) to vote today. He said:

This is our chance to take the power to lead America out of the Bush Republicans' hands. Winning means raising the minimum wage. Winning means moving towards health care for all, starting with every child in America. Winning means forcing an end to the disastrous war in Iraq, and getting our heroes home.

"The disastrous war in Iraq" refers to the one Kerry voted for four years ago. "Our heroes" refers to the people who, Kerry suggested last week, are not smart or educated enough to avoid getting "stuck in Iraq."

And doesn't "forcing an end" mean American defeat? For an answer to that, let's turn to a Washington Post report from Iraq:

For the U.S. troops fighting in Iraq, the war is alternately violent and hopeful, sometimes very hot and sometimes very cold. It is dusty and muddy, calm and chaotic, deafeningly loud and eerily quiet.

The one thing the war is not, however, is finished, dozens of soldiers across the country said in interviews. And leaving Iraq now would have devastating consequences, they said. . . .

"Take us out of that vacuum--and it's on the edge now--and boom, it would become a free-for-all," said Lt. Col. Mark Suich, who commands the 1st Squadron, 89th Cavalry Regiment just south of Baghdad. "It would be a raw contention for power. That would be the bloodiest piece of this war." . . .

"Pulling out now would be as bad or worse than going forward with no changes," [Capt. Jim] Modlin said. "Sectarian violence would be rampant, democracy would cease to exist, and the rule of law would be decimated. It's not 'stay the course,' and it's not 'cut and run' or other political catchphrases. There are people's lives here. There are so many different dynamics that go on here that a simple solution just isn't possible."


Kerry's "simple solution" was tried once before--in Vietnam. The Vietnamese paid a heavy price, and America still pays one. We've noted before al Qaeda No. 2 Ayman al-Zawahiri's observation that "the aftermath of the collapse of American power in Vietnam--and how they ran and left their agents--is noteworthy." The Middle East Media Research Institute reports that Hezbollah honcho Hassan Nasrallah is also taking inspiration from America's defeat in Vietnam. Quoting Nasrallah:

The Americans will gather their belongings and leave this region - the entire region. They have no future whatsoever in our region. They will leave the Middle East, and the Arab and Islamic worlds, like they left Vietnam. I advise all those who place their trust in the Americans to learn the lesson of Vietnam, and to learn the lesson of the South Lebanese Army with the Israelis, and to know that when the Americans lose this war--and lose it they will, Allah willing--they will abandon them to their fate, just like they did to all those who placed their trust in them throughout history.

What Nasrallah is hoping for is what John Kerry and some of his fellow Democrats are already advocating.

opinionjournal.com



To: PROLIFE who wrote (14375)11/7/2006 10:31:53 PM
From: RMF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
Yeah, Kerry's stunt did bother me. I've always thought the guy was a jerk.

With Bush, the whole thing was a dumb, disrepectful stunt.
The fighter, the flight suit, the sign. Bush did everything he could to avoid the draft and then avoid his duty to the Guard, so his landing on that Carrier as if he were somehow "one of the guys" was a sleazy show of disrespect to the guys that actually have to risk their lives flying fighters.