Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LoneClone who wrote (24479)	11/6/2006 3:14:31 PM
From: jackjc	Respond to of 78416

Not experienced, for that ask EC.................... Toxics can cause trouble in the processing as resulting tailings have limits allowable, adds cost to comply. Also while not toxic per se, cu has to be limited in the moly conc (moly is an important product for CUU), so there are costs involved. I would not touch the YZC Wolverine deposit yrs ago because of a toxic element, which has now become very valuable and become an asset I believe.

To: LoneClone who wrote (24479)	11/6/2006 3:18:55 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78416

alz.v - coming alive here, moderate volume yet but it's due for a big day, imho cuu.v - stockwatch didn't have to put such a snotty header on that release ... 'Copper Fox reassays hole to 3.29 g/t Au from 95 g/t' - it sounds like they made a mistake, and they didn't, they're just being conservative due to the nugget effect which the re-assay demonstrated quite amply mmg - even with two dollar zinc and a new senior listing, i'd still like to see this morning's gap close ... ooh and here it comes, just printed 3.70, six cents to go ... then let 'er rip, on a solid chart