Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (309483)	11/7/2006 11:20:47 AM
From: TimF	Respond to of 1576659

I see........if you try to protect your spouse, you automatically become a military person and can be killed without a trial or anything else. Even outside of war and terrorism, if your spouse is a criminal and you protect them you are an accessory and can face punishment. Do you think we should leave people, countries, and organizations that are protecting terrorists alone? If a group of German women voluntarily marched in front of an SS Panzer division in WWII should we have let the panzer division retreat so that it could attack later? I see.....killing is alright so long as you use restraint. Killing evil people who are trying to kill you is quite ok. So then, if a mugger kills you tonite but only uses two bullets to do it's okay because he used some restraint? No the mugger is a criminal, and I wasn't waging war or terrorism against the mugger.