SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (11225)11/7/2006 4:32:56 PM
From: Elroy Jetson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 218030
 
Your plan to dissolve the ocean's corals through carbon dioxide sequestration on the ocean bottom will no doubt meet with applause in Australia.

For decades they have been looking for a method to remove the Great Barrier Reef.

I still don't see your posts on the Sydney Morning Herald blog - link below.

blogs.smh.com.au

Your peculiar genius should not be bottled up in a small Financial Collapse closet, but should be shared with the world.
.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (11225)11/7/2006 7:34:55 PM
From: gg cox  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 218030
 
M, EROEI is not a dopey idea.I am heating my house with wood...a good deal if wood is close by.It might not be such a good deal if i have to expend vast amounts of energy(money if you wish) to get to it, cut and haul it to my home.I would say ..this is a dopey idea to do this..i may as well turn on the gas furnace (get heat for less money.)Using more energy or money units to get less energy or money units is a dopey idea, so the Concept of EROEI is not a dopey idea.

Trying to capture energy from falling liquid c02 thru a sea water pipe might be a dopey idea.Trying to recover energy from all water dropping thru hi rise buildings might be a dopey idea too.Plenty of dopey ideas, but i still believe EROEI is usefull in determinig the better dopey ideas <g>