SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Metacomet who wrote (11274)11/8/2006 9:56:04 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Respond to of 218005
 
My boe calculation was not to many significant figures. 400 metres was the minimum as I recall from 18 years ago. 500 metres is a nice round number.

If keeping the CO2 away from the surface is an issue, deeper will be better. I guess that 400 metres is deep enough, but perhaps deeper would be better.

The subduction trenches would really give some fall and some depth to the storage zone.

Mqurice


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News