SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Pitera who wrote (7449)11/8/2006 11:40:58 AM
From: John Pitera  Respond to of 33421
 
Investors regroup as swaps panic hits

theaustralian.news.com.au

Paul J Davies, Gillian Tett, London
07nov06

INVESTMENT banks and hedge funds are being forced to rapidly adjust their trading strategies amid a wave of "panic selling" reported in the US and European credit derivatives market last week.

This heavy selling has driven the cost of insuring debt against default in the market for credit default swaps to record low levels - signalling either that investors are extraordinarily optimistic about the outlook for corporate debt, or that prices are so distorted that they are no longer being paid for the risks they are taking on.

Credit default swaps make up the majority of the rapidly expanding $US26,000 billion ($33,000 billion) credit derivatives market.

They offer a kind of insurance against non-payment of corporate debt with the buyer of protection paying an annual premium that is a percentage of the amount of debt covered.

When the price of CDS instruments drops, this leads to mark-to-market losses for those holding the instrument and who have bought protection because they are paying a premium that is greater than the market rate.

The sharp price swings of the past week have confounded many investors who had expected to see the cost of debt insurance rise this northern winter, as part of a broader turn in the credit cycle.

Instead, those who have been buying protection in CDS markets - or expressing a negative view on the outlook for corporate bonds - have been wrong-footed by a so-called "perfect storm" of factors that have affected derivatives prices.

Company results have been strong, US rate expectations have shifted, and there has been a wave of CDS trading linked to a new derivatives product called "constant proportion debt obligation", which was created by some investment banks a couple of months ago.

Taken together, these factors have pushed CDS prices lower and are believed to have caused pain at some major investment banks and hedge funds.

Some of these are now apparently being forced to sell to cover their loses, which has exacerbated the market swing.

"(Recent trends) have led to panic selling of CDS," said Suki Mann, analyst at SG CIB.

Analysts warn that this "panic selling" could continue into this week.

"A number of (investors) appear to have finally thrown in the towel for 2006 and with the market sensing this move, it has further deepened their pain, creating a classic short squeeze," BNP Paribas said in a research note.

The most visible measures of credit derivatives pricing are Europe's iTraxx and the US CDX indices.

In the past two weeks, the main iTraxx index of investment grade companies has seen the cost of protection drop more than 16 per cent - or a change of 4.375 basis points to about 22.75bp, while the index of junk-rated names has fallen more than 7 per cent at 238bp, both record lows.



To: John Pitera who wrote (7449)11/27/2006 1:12:25 PM
From: John Pitera  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
Portfolio Insurance
November 20, 2006; Page C1
The world is awash in credit. For the sake of investors, it had better be awash in good credit analysis, too.

So far this year, a record $2.3 trillion in investment-grade bonds have hit been issued globally, according to Thomson Financial. This already tops last year's $2.1 trillion.


The rise in bond issuance is a trifle compared with what is happening in credit-derivative markets. The issuance of credit-default swaps, which are basically insurance contracts written against debt default, is soaring. As of the end of June, such contracts had been written against a total value of $26 trillion in debt, according to the International Swaps and Derivatives Association. That was up from $17.1 trillion at the end of 2005 and $8.4 trillion at the end of 2004.

Banks and other debt holders can buy credit-default swaps to limit risk. If a borrower goes into default, debt holders will lose money on the debt, but the default swaps they hold will rise in value, helping to mitigate the loss.

On the other side of the trade, sellers of credit-default swaps have a nice source of income, as long as the issuer whose debt they are backing doesn't go belly up.

The boom in credit-default swaps, as well as other derivative instruments that allow creditors to mitigate risk, and the run-up in bond issuance may not be unrelated. The decision to buy or underwrite a bond is easier to make if you can offload some of the risk associated with it. By diffusing risk, the chances for financial blowups seems to be diminished.

But in the process of spending so much brain power slicing and dicing risk and passing it around, Wall Street might miss more fundamental questions about the underlying health of companies issuing bonds.

Frank Partnoy, of the University of San Diego, and David Skeel Jr. of the University of Pennsylvania Law School illustrated this point in a recent paper by pointing out that the banks that financed Enron's debt used massive amounts of credit derivatives to limit their own risk of the company going into default. That is one reason they might have fallen asleep at the switch.

The real test for credit derivatives might not come until the next recession, when the chances of corporate debt defaults will rise. Nobody can say when that downturn will come, but when it does, it will be a nail-biting time.

Write to Justin Lahart at justin.lahart@wsj.com1

-----------------------

Derivatives Tails Are Wagging Corporate Bond Dogs: Mark Gilbert

By Mark Gilbert

Nov. 23 (Bloomberg) -- The bond vigilantes may have retired; the derivatives vigilantes are saddling up.

Last week, London-based hedge fund Cairn Capital persuaded Experian Group Ltd. to change the terms of a bond issue to safeguard derivatives holders. In October, New York-based hedge fund Blue Mountain Capital told cable-television operator Liberty Global Inc. that the company could have won cheaper borrowing by consulting with derivatives owners before selling new bonds.

Bond prices for Delphi Corp. and Dura Automotive Systems Inc. whipsawed as owners of debt insurance on the two bankrupt U.S. auto-parts makers raced to buy securities to resolve the contracts. And for weeks, European indexes that track credit derivatives have bounced around as traders try to second-guess whether new securities are about to flood the market.

All of which is evidence that the credit-derivatives tail is starting to wag the corporate bond market, altering the behavior of borrowers and directly influencing the value of the securities that derivatives such as credit-default swaps are based on.

Suppose you signed up for a five-year auto-insurance policy, only for your car to disappear in a way not covered by the insurer (zapped by aliens, say). You would still owe the annual premium even though the policy had become worthless.

That's one of the risks facing credit-default swap holders. They may have bought derivatives insurance to safeguard their corporate debt investment, only for the bonds to disappear because the company decided to repay them early, which often happens when a borrower gets taken over.

Reconciling Needs

To get paid on a credit swap, the holder has to hand over the defaulted securities, just like a driver claiming for an unsalvageable car has to deliver the crashed vehicle to the insurer. The swaps become worthless if the bonds disappear.

The deal brokered by Cairn Capital with Experian is designed to avoid that situation. It introduces a new flavor of investor protection to the debt markets, reconciling the credit-checking company's funding needs with those of investors who had augmented their fixed-income investments with derivatives.

In the event of a takeover trashing Experian's credit rating to non-investment grade, bondholders can choose either full repayment or a higher interest rate -- the latter option crafted for investors who don't want to unravel their derivatives strategies by handing back their bonds.

``The technique of offering bondholders a coupon step-up as an alternative to the more traditional put at par is an important innovation,'' said Deniz Akgul, an analyst at Cairn. ``We hope and expect coupon step-ups will be used more widely to ensure stability in the credit-swap market.''

Chasing Debt

Default swaps on Rentokil Initial Plc, a London-based pest- control and washroom facilities company, lost 80 percent of their value earlier this year after a change in its capital structure erased the debt linked to those contracts. Delphi bonds were trading at about 57 percent of face value before the Troy, Michigan-based company filed for bankruptcy in October 2005. With $20 billion of credit swaps and only $2 billion of bonds, prices soared to about 70 percent as derivatives traders fought over the scarce securities.

``Corporate events can have unexpected effects on bonds, with the opposite happening to credit-default swaps,'' says Andrew Sutherland, who oversees about 13 billion pounds ($25 billion) of corporate bond investments at Standard Life Plc in Edinburgh. ``Treasurers have got to be aware of it.''

Unintended Consequences

Last month, default swaps on Englewood, Colorado-based Liberty doubled in 20 minutes after the company decided to replace an existing bond issue with new debt that could be transferred to its Dutch unit, rather than retiring the old notes. That prompted an offer from Blue Mountain Chief Executive Officer Andrew Feldstein, who manages the $3.6 billion hedge fund, to buy new bonds at a lower yield provided the obligations couldn't be switched.

``Advising a corporate client on a bond buyback that will extinguish the reference obligation on which credit derivatives are based generates market-sensitive information just as advising a client on a takeover does,'' Thomas Huertas, the banking- industry supervisor at the Financial Services Authority, which regulates U.K. financial markets, said in a Sept. 19 speech.

At the beginning of the month, an index that tracks the 30 most-volatile European default swaps jumped 6.5 basis points higher in a week, climbing to about 49 basis points after declining for six consecutive weeks.

Feedback Cycle

The moves were driven by speculation about a new strain of credit derivative called a constant proportion debt obligation, invented by ABN Amro Holding NV. Traders tried to anticipate whether ABN had found additional buyers for the new securities, which would have shifted the balance of buyers and sellers in the default-swap market. That sets up a feedback cycle; lower default-swap values make it harder to engineer derivative products at attractive yields for investors.

The credit-derivatives market is too big to ignore. It doubled in a year, surging to more than $20 trillion by the middle of this year, according to figures released last week by the Basel, Switzerland-based Bank for International Settlements.

Companies are typically fixated on their shareholders, reluctant to even acknowledge their bondholders. They are about to discover a whole new constituency of investors clamoring for attention -- the derivatives crowd.

(Mark Gilbert is a Bloomberg News columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.)

To contact the writer of this column: Mark Gilbert in London at magilbert@bloomberg.net .



To: John Pitera who wrote (7449)11/30/2006 3:18:20 PM
From: John Pitera  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 33421
 
CPDO-- constant proportion debt obligation -- PREMIUM BONDS

The Economist
Nov 9th 2006

Buy now, worry later

FEAR and greed are supposed to govern financial markets. Right now, investors seem far more like lumberjacks at an all-you-can-eat buffet than claustrophobes trapped in a lift. Despite nagging concerns about the American economy, global stockmarkets are at multi-year highs. Takeovers are booming and bankers on Wall Street and in London are counting on bumper bonuses. Even the influx of protectionists into America's Congress has been met, by and large, with a shrug.

If there is one market that sums up the insouciant attitude to risk, it would have to be corporate debt. After an extremely good run, the difference between the interest rate companies pay and that which (much
safer) treasury bonds pay has fallen substantially. Until recently, most investors expected that as the American economy slowed, companies would run into difficulty, forcing those borrowing costs higher.

But it hasn't and bankers are coming up with increasingly ingenious ways to offer fixed-income investors additional returns. Enter the newest symbol of the corporate-bond bonanza: an instrument known cryptically as the constant proportion debt obligation, or CPDO.

CPDOs are built on the back of credit-default swaps--the greatest credit innovation of the past decade--which give investors the chance to insure against a company going bust. Now CPDOs offer the same option for an entire index. And with the help of a lot of borrowed money, they offer some juicy returns.

Like a swap, issuers of CPDOs get premium income upfront but have to pay out if a company in the index defaults. The beauty of the structure is that the insurance is sold only on a rolling six-month basis. The chance of one of the index's components defaulting within the next six months is very low. Even if the company's finances do deteriorate, it will probably be dropped from the index by the time the six months are up.

That means the credit agencies are happy to award CPDOs their highest(AAA-style) rating. But unlike other top-rated debt instruments, CPDOs pay a succulent interest rate of as much as two percentage points over cash.

Gary Jenkins of Deutsche Bank points out that, historically, investors have been overpaid for the default risk on high-quality corporate bonds. CPDOs take advantage of this anomaly. They employ another gimmick, too. If the markets move against them, the issuer borrows more money to sell more insurance. The extra premiums earned make up for the capital loss suffered in the market. In theory, a CPDO could have 15 times more debt than capital.

The structure was pioneered only in August, and has yet to be tested in a crisis. However, Georges Assi of Lehman Brothers says it is inherently market-stabilising: CPDO issuers will be buying when others are selling.

The CPDO craze is just one sign of investors' appetite for corporate debt. Sales of corporate bonds and leveraged (high-risk) loans are breaking records. Investors are happy to take the extra yield today and worry about the risk later.

Similar SANG FROID is being displayed about America's stockmarket. By the start of this week, the S&P 500 index had not fallen by 1% in 111 days, one of its longest winning streaks in the past 25 years.

If investors were worried about losing those gains, they would be paying up for options to protect against a sudden fall in share prices. But the VIX index of American stockmarket volatility (a measure of the cost of buying options) was close to a ten-year low in late October.

Why this confidence? The fall in oil prices since August has been a great help, at a stroke both bringing down headline inflation rates and boosting the incomes of consumers. It helps, too, that company profits in America are still growing at a double-digit annual rate. According to Lehman Brothers, positive surprises in the third-quarter results are outpacing negative ones by almost five to one.

Good news, for sure, but isn't there too much complacency? America's recent economic data have sown confusion (see article[1]), but even where the news has appeared positive, dangers lurk. The biggest threat for companies is that unit labour costs are growing faster than 5% a year. A combination of slower overall growth and rising wage costs should squeeze profit margins. With profits at a 40-year high as a share of GDP, it is hard to see the news getting much better.

But though investors may realise that something is bound to go wrong eventually, getting the timing right is a completely separate question. Over the past three years, those who have acted out of fear have generally lost money. With tasty morsels such as CPDOs on the table, greed is the much more tempting option.

-----
[1] economist.com