Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (309873)	11/8/2006 8:47:22 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573512

"The data is enough to show the weaker claim that losing this many seats is not all that unusual for a 6th year president or a sign of total collapse." It is unusual in that there usually is a reason for it, over and above it being the 6th year. Again, the Great Depression dragging on, civil rights and Watergate. It is intellectually dishonest to pretend that it is decoupled from that. These things don't just sail out of the blue, it is the electorate trying to send a message. Losing some seats is common in a mid-term election. Losing 30 isn't. Unless there is something else going on. "More like because of all his efforts." You keep claiming that without anything to back it up. If that were the case, the rest of the world would have been recovering from the same economic collapse, but they weren't either. Nobody was recovering before the war consumed them.