Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Triffin who wrote (87145)	11/9/2006 10:42:30 AM
From: T L Comiskey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361358

too bad we cannot strip the War Mongers of their wealth.. I believe it would solve a lot,, Imagine If these swindlers had to surrender every last dime

To: Triffin who wrote (87145)	11/9/2006 10:45:54 AM
From: Wharf Rat	Respond to of 361358

the strongest and only relevant case for impeachment would be taking the country to war under false pretenses .. That's a good reason. More worthy than lying about sex, eh? But these things have more than one charge. I think there were 5 against Clinton. Lots of stuff they can use. I don't want somebody to come along in 5 or 15 or 50 years and say they are free to do what they want, based on this admin. I don't want a king. I don't want totalitarianism. I don't want a country in which the pres can't get some on the side without getting impeached. It's bad enuf the rest of the world can do whatever they want with force, based on our model. The most powerful nation ever to be seen in the universe outside of a movie screen, and discounting the unknown, behaves badly, and everybody else can. China can attack NK. Japan can attack NK. US can attack Iran. (And nobody can attack Darfur.)