Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: loantech who wrote (24807)	11/9/2006 2:04:15 PM
From: que seria	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78410

Slan: I take it that when you say As thread originator I want no picks of Claudes or any other NLW posted on the thread for at least a few days after the initial write up or email alert in order to allow subscribers to take or not take a position you mean no attribution to Claude or another newsletter writer of that pick. There is nothing wrong with talking about a stock a NLW just picked. The valid point (sorry Koan, I respectfully disagree with you) is that decent interval (at least a day or two) should pass before a given NLW is named as the source of the pick. That is in deference to him and his subscribers and is not a copyright issue. Of course, non-subscribers such as I have no way to know what a NLW has picked when we chose to talk about a stock we own or notice, so the rule has to be about NLW's endorsements, not the stocks themselves. So: ODN.V! SRD.V!! MOX.AX!!! I'm giving away my speculative secrets (except that Red put me on to SRD). No clue if Claude or Kaiser likes one of those, but I own them. Don't want to steal anyone's thunder here. :<) P.S. Possibly of note to DPTR holders, GDN.AX (GSRCF) took a dive on volume in Australia yesterday. Maybe Leadville interval was more leaden than gaseous? Can't find news.