SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (11346)11/9/2006 10:13:46 PM
From: Rolla Coasta  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217887
 
what are you going to do about the bubble that you KNOW will develop and only perish two years from now? buying? if not, why not? or do you not KNOW?

All those seminors tout commodity stocks too. Perhaps mining stocks are good hedge. So you think this logic is correct: "US drops their own dollar and buys gold to gain manufacturing advantage."



To: TobagoJack who wrote (11346)11/10/2006 4:04:07 PM
From: Rolla Coasta  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217887
 
This seems to be the accurate picture:

quebecoislibre.org

Quote at the conclusion:

"Some are concerned that new annual supplies of gold will be insufficient to carry on the growing amounts and value of world trade. Gold, a hard currency, may have a new production rate that may not keep pace with economic growth. This really presents no problem. The existing quantity of money is always enough to conduct the existing volume of trade. Some deflation may be inevitable, but this simply means that overall prices will be lower."