Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bcrafty who wrote (138407)	11/10/2006 11:10:15 AM
From: Henry J Costanzo	Respond to of 209892

OT...Excellent post, BC...(as usual...vbg)

To: bcrafty who wrote (138407)	11/10/2006 11:29:51 AM
From: stkboy1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

O/T ..well if it is banned by the board I shouldn't have posted the article. I found it interesting (although incomplete) that the resignation comes after concerns from "senior compliance officers" Not sure of Cush's study but Lee at market swing marketswing.com has been keeping track and there did seem to be a great deal of repos up to the election. Can't see a market going down if you have constant liquidity being pumped into the market. It does seem to be a split opinion concerning this topic and a sore one with some people so I shall stay off the subject. These were recent comments from the big picture bigpicture.typepad.com As to manipulations in the equity markets, I am undecided about that. I will note that several people far more experienced than I -- and far less cycnical, too -- have been commenting about the "Preternatural bid underneath." I may have to assemble some of the more cogent commentary along those lines. Of course, the Fed does control money supply, and while it is understandable their providing additional liquidity during the rate tightening phase (i.e, more money supply as rates go higher) the most recent firehose of cash hitting the past few months since the pause is a bit harder to rationalize...