SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (186230)11/11/2006 11:40:01 PM
From: SiouxPal  Respond to of 793955
 
"have you?" Oh yes ma'am. Right here in Florida. Front page of the St. Pete Times, one of the best 10 papers in America they say.
I use it mostly for the sports pages though.
By the thyme I read it I already know the stuff.

Peace.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (186230)11/12/2006 3:37:08 AM
From: KLP  Respond to of 793955
 
The Repubs are grown ups...The others were just...whiners...



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (186230)11/12/2006 6:18:04 PM
From: Mary Cluney  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 793955
 
I haven't heard a single solitary peep about the the unreliability of electronic voting machines since then, have you? I guess the mid-term election of 2006 has completely vindicated Diebold.

You just have to have a paper trail. Without a paper trail any programmer can rig those machines, whether it is Diebold or those Venezualen owners of the other voting machine manufacterer.

How difficult is it to alter the voting by switching the vote count after every one hundred (or any number) votes. Almost any programmer can write code to branch to some part of memory that contain code to alter the vote and then wipe out any trace of that activity.

You don't have to be a rocket scientist programmer to be able to do that. If it can be done, then people are going to do it.

Maybe both sides were doing it and it cancelled each other out - or that the margin was much too big to overcome.