SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: T L Comiskey who wrote (87952)11/12/2006 11:15:17 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Respond to of 361019
 
Bad news, Bud...we may not be able to lock down to a rig in ANWAR...


Bill Allowing More Drilling Along Coasts Appears Dead

By CLIFFORD KRAUSS
Published: November 11, 2006
HOUSTON, Nov. 9 — Just a few months ago House Republicans and representatives of the energy industry were poised to rewrite a quarter-century of national energy policy and open the seas off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts to oil and gas drilling, which environmentalists had fervently resisted.

But Tuesday’s Democratic victory in midterm elections has changed the legislative landscape, obliterating the chances that anything close to the aggressive drilling bill passed by the House of Representatives will be enacted for years to come.

Now, with the Democrats’ mid-term election victory, the proponents of drilling off the nation’s beaches are reluctantly jockeying to settle for a small patch of new offshore exploration allowed in a competing and more modest Senate drilling bill. “I don’t want to end up having no progress,” said Representative John E. Peterson, a Pennsylvania Republican who is a leading proponent for expanded offshore drilling. “Something is better than nothing.”

He added, “With Nancy Pelosi as speaker it will be difficult to talk about producing in the outer continental shelf.”

Dave Parker, president of the American Gas Association, which represents utilities, said: “It’s a matter of being pragmatic. The Republicans who had thought they would retain control basically now have one option, which is to accept the Senate-passed version.”

The Senate bill opens to bidding 8.3 million acres of federal waters in the Gulf of Mexico. The waters, south of the Florida Panhandle and 235 miles west of Tampa, are thought to hold 5.8 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 1.3 billion barrels of crude oil.

Exxon Mobil, Shell, BP, ConocoPhillips and many independents are expected to make bids in the area, known as Lease Area 181, which is attractive because it is relatively shallow and close to pipelines and other infrastructure built previously.

Many lawmakers and energy industry officials had expressed little enthusiasm for the Senate bill before the election. They said it was too limited because it would produce, at most, only the equivalent of two months of domestic demand for oil, along with enough gas to cool and heat six million homes for 15 years.

Unlike the House version, the Senate bill would prohibit drilling over a far greater area, in particular a section 125 miles off most of Florida’s west coast.

The House bill, passed in June, would virtually eliminate a federal moratorium on drilling on most of the outer continental shelf off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts that has been in place since 1982. In the summer, energy industry leaders were in strong support of the House bill.

Industry officials said drilling off the two coasts would add enormous amounts of oil and gas to the national inventory over many years, though the exact amounts are not known.

Brian J. Kennedy, deputy chief of staff for the House Committee on Resources, conceded that there was now no chance of expanding offshore drilling at anything close to what the House had hoped for, but he expressed hope that a law could be enacted in the lame-duck session.

Speaking of Representative Richard W. Pombo of California, chairman of the Resources Committee and chief backer of the House bill, Mr. Kennedy added, “The chairman wants a bill and he’ll do everything he can to make sure we get a bill.” Mr. Pombo lost his re-election bid.

Mr. Kennedy said Senate and House leaders had already agreed to some compromises, a provision to recover up to $13 billion in lost revenue from energy companies and a set-aside of some future energy production revenue for rural schools.

Some Senate Republicans would like to amend the Senate bill to give Virginia an option to opt out of the moratorium, according to Congressional sources. But it remains doubtful Senate Democratic leaders would go along with such a version.

Before the midterm election was tallied, lobbyists for energy and manufacturing companies switched tack and began pressing Congressional leaders and the White House to enact the Senate bill passed in August and discard most if not all of the far more ambitious House bill.

Industry officials said the lobbying campaign began weeks ago when it became clear that Democrats had a good chance of taking the House. “I would hope that the House could appreciate what is possible and try to help move forward for the American people,” John Hofmeister, president of Shell Oil, said in an interview. “Let’s get a bill cleared that the president can sign.”

nytimes.com



To: T L Comiskey who wrote (87952)11/12/2006 4:08:20 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Respond to of 361019
 
Exploding U.S. Grain Demand for Automotive Fuel Threatens World Food Security and Political Stability

Lester R. Brown

Now that the year’s grain harvest is safely in the bin, it is time to take stock and look ahead. This year’s harvest of 1,967 million tons is falling short of the estimated consumption of 2,040 million tons by some 73 million tons. This shortfall of nearly 4 percent is one of the largest on record.

Even more sobering, in six of the last seven years world grain production has fallen short of use. As a result, world carryover stocks of grain have been drawn down to 57 days of consumption, the lowest level in 34 years. The last time they were this low wheat and rice prices doubled. (See data.)

The growth in world grain consumption during the six years since 2000 averaged roughly 31 million tons per year. Of this growth, close to 24 million tons were consumed as food or feed. The annual growth in grain used to produce fuel ethanol for cars in the United States alone averaged nearly 7 million tons per year, climbing from 2 million tons in 2001 to 14 million tons in 2006.

Now the amount of grain used to produce fuel is exploding. Investment in crop-based fuel production, once dependent on government subsidies, is now driven by the price of oil. With the current price of ethanol double its cost of production, the conversion of agricultural commodities into fuel for cars has become hugely profitable. In the United States, this means that investment in fuel ethanol distilleries is controlled by the market, not by government.

The huge profits from converting corn into ethanol following the late 2005 oil price hikes have led to a jump in groundbreakings for new ethanol distilleries in the last few months. The World Ethanol and Biofuels reports, published biweekly by F.O. Licht, show construction starting on an astounding 54 new ethanol distilleries in the United States between October 25, 2005, and October 24, 2006. With a typical construction period of 14 months, virtually all of them will be producing by the end of 2007. Together these plants, with 4 billion gallons of annual ethanol production capacity, will consume 39 million tons of grain per year, nearly all of it corn. (See data.)

The pace of groundbreakings is accelerating. From November 2005 through June 2006, ground was broken for one new plant every nine days. From July through September 2006, construction starts increased to one every five days. In October 2006, it was one every three days.

Since it typically takes many months for a company to decide to build a distillery, select a site, buy the land, acquire the needed permits, and arrange the financing, the post-Katrina jump in oil prices has only begun to show up in groundbreakings for new plants in the last few months.

To calculate the amount of grain that will be going into ethanol, we start with the 41 million tons of the 2005 crop that were used to produce ethanol and add to that 39 million tons for the new construction starts for a total of 80 million tons of corn. This does not include the additional grain required by the expansion of several existing plants. Nor does it involve the numerous new grain-based ethanol distilleries in other countries, principally those in Europe and China.

Given the recent acceleration in new groundbreakings and the scores of new plants in the planning stages, we could see even more construction starts in the next 12 months. If so, these distilleries could easily absorb an additional 40 million tons of grain.

In looking forward to 2007, how much will we need to increase the harvest to avoid a further drawdown in stocks? First, we need a rise of 73 million tons just to overcome the 2006 production shortfall. Beyond that we will need 24 million tons of additional output to cover the estimated annual growth in food and feed needs. If we then add 39 million additional tons to supply the 54 new distilleries cited above, for the U.S. alone we are looking at a growth in demand of 136 million tons of additional grain from the 2007 harvest if we are to avoid a further decline in stocks.

For a world where the growth in the grain harvest has averaged scarcely 20 million tons per year since 2000, the chances of such a huge jump in the harvest next year are not good, even with the stimulus of high grain prices. Beyond this, farmers must contend with spreading shortages of irrigation water and the prospect of even more intense heat waves as the earth’s temperature rises.

Escalating competition for the U.S. corn crop is already driving up prices. In some corn-growing states such as Iowa, Indiana, and South Dakota, completion of the plants under construction and those planned means distillery requirements would take virtually the states’ entire corn harvest.

The local competition between new distilleries, on the one hand, and more traditional feedlots, dairies, and pork, poultry, and egg producers, on the other, will be intense. To some degree, the one-third of the corn byproduct that emerges from the distillery as distillers grain will offset the loss of corn for feeding. Distillers grain, consisting mostly of fiber and protein and containing little energy, is, however, much better suited to feed beef and dairy cattle with their unique digestive systems, than pigs and chickens.

Corn importers like Japan, Egypt, and Mexico are also worried that the likely reduction in U.S. corn exports, which are 70 percent of the world total, will disrupt their livestock and poultry industries. In some importing countries in sub-Saharan Africa and in Mexico, corn is the staple food. In the United States corn supplies sweetener for soft drinks and is used in breakfast cereals, but most corn is consumed indirectly. The milk, eggs, cheese, chicken, ham, ground beef, ice cream, and yogurt in the typical refrigerator are all produced with corn. In effect, the refrigerator is filled with corn. And the price of every item in the refrigerator is affected by the price of corn.

Wheat and corn prices have climbed by a third or more over the past several months. Corn and wheat futures are both trading at 10-year highs. With corn stocks at the lowest level on record and demand soaring, corn prices appear headed for historic highs. Wheat and rice prices will likely follow corn prices upward. By the end of 2007, the emerging competition between the 800 million automobile owners who want to maintain their mobility and the world’s 2 billion poorest people who want simply to survive will be on center stage. If grain prices do climb to all-time highs, food riots and political instability in lower-income countries that import grain, such as Indonesia, Nigeria, Mexico, and scores of other countries, could disrupt global economic progress.

This clash between motorists and people over the food supply is occurring when 854 million of the world’s people are chronically hungry and malnourished and some 24,000 of them, mostly children, die each day. The U.N. Millennium Development Goal of reducing by half the proportion of people suffering from hunger by 2015 is now failing as the number who are hungry edges upward, and it could collapse completely in the face of the food-for-cars onslaught.

The attempt to solve one problem—growing U.S. dependence on imported oil—is creating another far more serious problem. Fortunately this can be avoided. The 3 percent of U.S. automotive fuel supplies now coming from ethanol could be achieved, several times over and at a fraction of the cost, by raising automobile fuel-efficiency standards by 20 percent.

On the food-versus-fuel issue, the world desperately needs leadership—a strategy to deal with the emerging food-fuel competition. As the world’s leading grain producer and exporter, as well as its largest producer of ethanol, the United States is in the driver’s seat.

Copyright © 2006 Earth Policy Institute
earth-policy.org