Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonkie who wrote (88043)	11/12/2006 9:59:59 PM
From: worksinjammies	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 362341

That is what I felt the plan may be (or at least it is my hope) Initially, say impeachment is not on the agenda, then with mounting evidence, follow the public outcry for it. That way, come 2008, the Dems can simply point to public demand, not simply political payback.

To: zonkie who wrote (88043)	11/12/2006 11:37:29 PM
From: ThirdEye	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 362341

One little item that was not defeated last week was the republican spin machine, aided and abetted by the MSM. Sure, we can say that alot of people have seen through it, but when it comes down to grinding out some hearings and digging for the truth, that machine will be on full throttle to minimize, obfuscate and divert attention form it. And the media will be hard-pressed to take its own view that impeachment "would be bad for the country." If there's "alot of evidence in existence" already, what will it take? What's the tipping point?