SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (310570)11/13/2006 5:26:29 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572630
 
Castro did not have any power inside the US, he was a low budget grass roots revolutionary from the sugar cane fields. He had little if any spy network inside the US, and Iswald was not working for Castro.

Castro didn't need some powerful spy network in the US. Oswald was willing to work on his behalf which is why he set up a "Fair Play for Cuba" organization, printed up flyers, etc.

There was only one general group which had the means to pull off the JFK killing and then cover it up, and that was the far rightwing of the FBI-CIA mob world, all of whom worked together in Cuba against Castro, all of whom were allies on Bay Of Pigs, which they blamed JFK for pulling the plug on.

One man with a rifle can kill a President. As for covering it up, lots of people like conspiracy theories with the people they hate as the villains and will do the coverup for the assassin.

You're just plain wrong about communists killing JFK or RFK and ML King.

I have only said Oswald was a communist. Sirhan and Ray were not and I haven't said so.

There was only one all-powerful man in American who feared and hated all three, J. Edgar Hoover, and he happened to have the means to pull it off too, with some help from his rightwing and mob friends.

Hoover did have a bug up his ass about King. But there's no reason to think he did re. the Kennedy's.

BTW Hoover was not all-powerful either.

There is no reason not to believe Oswald's last statement "I'm a patsy". That is, he was used, set up and frasmed to take the fall, then quickly murdered and silenced so he wouldn't talk.

Guilty people frequently claim innonence. Oswald would have been convicted pretty easily.

The fact that he was a schitzo type with one side of his personality pro Marxist just made him a more perfect patsy.

My, my. Now you admit he was a Marxist.

But even if he did make the killshot, which is highly debatable, he had nothing to do with the cover up.

If he did the "killshot" which side of his schizo personality pulled the trigger IYIO?

Nor did he even have a motive.

Other than his devotion to Fidel.