Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (4744)	11/14/2006 4:33:37 PM
From: Jim S	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10087

"Any action to reduce Congressional corruption would have to be in the form of a Constitutional Amendment." I don't think a Constitutional Amendment would be needed, just a rules change of both bodies. "Whenever Congress makes any changes in rules that govern Congress the rules changes benefit currently sitting members." True. Which is not to say that it must always be that way. If there were to be a groundswell of voter sentiment, there might be enough pressure to cause some real changes, a la the "Contract With America" in '94. I think dissatisfaction at the grassroots level is getting almost to the point where such a thing might happen, especially if a new Ross Perot or Steve Forbes were to make it a campaign issue in '08.