SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim S who wrote (4763)11/14/2006 5:21:43 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 10087
 
a. A person is elected because he is trusted to be smart enough to decide the important issues, using his own judgement.

or,

b. He is elected to vote the consensus of his constituents on their behalf.

If a congress critter believes his purpose is as stated in a., he can do no wrong by voting against the wishes of those who elected him.


and if he believes its b, then going against what he thinks is in the best decision on important issues, because the opposite decision is popular can't really be considered corruption.

I suppose if he believes a, but tilts around to whatever is popular so that he can get votes, that would be corrupt in the sense that gem uses the term, but I don't see how it could be actionable (except possibly by not reflecting him.



To: Jim S who wrote (4763)11/14/2006 5:23:31 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10087
 
"If a congress critter believes his purpose is as stated in a., he can do no wrong by voting against the wishes of those who elected him."

Nor is that what I stated as a criteria for measuring corruption.

"when a representative allows an influence to adversely effect or conflict with them representing the interests of their constituency. "