Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (11545)	11/15/2006 3:40:13 PM
From: energyplay	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217750

I am going to agree that the moves to exit Iraq come are "....surrender from a position of weakness and despair" I don't think the moves are unpatriotic. Compared to Viet Nam, where the US had a responsibility to the people of South Viet Nam, and the Republic of VietNam army. The US was there for a very long time - with major forces from 1962 to 1973. In Iraq, there is effectively no one on our side, except for Kurdistan. Kurdistan is in good shape, and I expect the US will be continuing assistance for a long time. I don't think the US present is doing the US much good, or the Iraqis. When you are in a hole, stop digging.