SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (754375)11/15/2006 5:52:10 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 769670
 
Activists rap new test for citizenship

By Joyce Howard Price
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Published November 15, 2006
washtimes.com

The federal government intends to replace the current test for U.S. citizenship with one that relies less on knowledge of specific facts and more on an applicant's grasp of democratic principles, but many immigrant-advocacy groups are up in arms about the change, which they worry may discriminate against those who don't speak English and with less education.

"We want to focus more on the building blocks of democracy, rather than the colors of the flag" or questions about the name of the form used to apply for naturalized citizenship, which are on the current test for citizenship, said Chris Bentley, a spokesman for the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, which is making the change. USCIS is part of the Department of Homeland Security.

Mr. Bentley said USCIS officials want a new test that can ensure that those seeking to become American citizens know about "freedoms guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, such as freedom of speech and freedom of religion."

"Our goal is not to make this test harder or easier for anyone, but to make it much more meaningful," he said.

Mr. Bentley said the proposal to redesign the test for naturalized citizenship came out of a report by a commission headed by former Rep. Barbara Jordan during the Clinton administration that "looked at all kinds of issues related to immigration."

The Jordan commission's report emphasized "effective Americanization of new immigrants, that is the cultivation of a shared commitment to the American values of liberty, democracy and equal opportunity," including policies to "help newcomers learn to speak, read and write English effectively."

The new citizenship test will be administered to all applicants for naturalization nationwide starting in January 2008. However, beginning this winter, at least 5,000 people in 10 cities will take part in a voluntary testing program featuring the new questions.

The number of potential questions will be narrowed from 125 to 100 during the pilot program. To pass, an immigrant must correctly answer six of 10 questions asked.

But more than 220 immigrant organizations, led by the Illinois Coalition of Immigrant and Refugee Rights, have signed a letter to USCIS Director Emilio Gonzalez denouncing the new test, which they worry will make it harder for "poorer legal immigrants with less English and less education" to win U.S. citizenship.

"Already immigrants must pass a citizenship test that many native-born Americans could not pass," say groups that include the National Council of La Raza, National Immigration Forum, Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, the United Farm Workers of America and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters.

There are some tough questions on the current test and queries that could be described as meaningful. One of the more difficult asks a person to identify amendments to the Constitution guaranteeing voting rights. Others ask what is the "supreme law of the land" -- the U.S. Constitution -- and the Bill of Rights (the first 10 amendments to the Constitution).

Just because the test for American citizenship is being revised "does not mean all the current questions will be done away," said Mr. Bentley. He was unable to provide any sample questions from the new test.

Jack Martin, special-projects director of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), a group that is critical of unlimited immigration, said there are both potential improvements and problems with the proposed changes.

"The effort at standardization makes sense ... the concept is good, and there really are some trivial questions on the current test," he said.

"Our only concern is that questions not be dumbed down" so that immigrants could become American citizens "without having a good understanding of U.S. history, culture and social systems, so they can vote intelligently," Mr. Martin said, adding that citizenship tests "should be designed to make sure citizens are prepared to participate in our political process."

As for those worried the new test might be harder or easier, Mr. Bentley said, USCIS intends to avoid those situations "by looking at pass-fail rates of the past."

Researcher Amy Baskerville contributed to this report.



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (754375)11/15/2006 5:53:29 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 769670
 
Conservatives wary of choice to lead RNC

Martinez should appeal to Latinos, but may lose support on immigration.

By Peter Wallsten and Nicole Gaouette
Times Staff Writers
November 15, 2006
latimes.com

WASHINGTON — President Bush's decision to back Sen. Mel Martinez to help lead the Republican Party, a move intended to appeal to disaffected Latino voters, drew sharp criticism Tuesday from some of the party's core conservatives, who disdain the Florida lawmaker's support for liberalized immigration laws.

The decision to name the Cuban-born Martinez as Republican National Committee general chairman served as an acknowledgment that the GOP had lost ground among Latinos; in last week's midterm election, the Republican share of the Latino vote dropped to 30% from more than 40% in 2004. Party leaders have said they need to build more support among Latinos for the GOP to regain its dominance.

Martinez supported legislation to create a guest worker program and a path to citizenship for many immigrants who are in this country illegally; Bush and many Latinos also backed versions of that plan. But the legislation that passed the Senate this year created a firestorm of opposition among conservative Republicans and much of the House GOP leadership, who derided it as amnesty for lawbreakers.

Criticism of Martinez came Tuesday from several conservatives, including Curly Haugland, an RNC member from North Dakota, who said he believed the party was far too focused on pandering to minorities.

"We're losing our base in droves because they don't get campaigned to," he said, referring to GOP-leaning conservatives.

Randy Pullen of Arizona, another RNC member and an activist against illegal immigration, likened Martinez's selection to the episode last year in which Bush named his longtime friend and legal counsel to the Supreme Court, only to reverse himself after a furious conservative backlash.

"I'm hoping that it's not another Harriet Miers moment," Pullen said.

Another leading critic of Bush's stance on immigration, Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.), chairman of the Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus, offered tepid support for Martinez.

Tancredo called the senator a "competent spokesman for our party," but added that if he "rejects the will of rank-and-file Republicans and uses the position to advocate for things like the president's amnesty proposal, then I believe the party could be headed for another shellacking at the polls in 2008."

Members of the Republican National Committee will meet in January to replace outgoing Chairman Ken Mehlman, who will leave after a two-year term in which an aggressive minority outreach effort was hampered by the immigration debate and other issues.

Despite the unhappiness among some RNC members over Martinez's selection, he is expected to win election as general chairman, making him the GOP's most visible spokesman leading up to the 2008 presidential election. The party's general counsel, Robert M. "Mike" Duncan, is expected to become RNC chairman and run day-to-day operations.

Bush introduced Martinez in a brief Oval Office ceremony Tuesday as his recommended pick for the party leadership.

The selection, which became public Monday, made it clear that Bush and his chief political strategist, Karl Rove, believed the party's future depended on striking a moderate image on immigration. It also suggested that the White House saw the party's support for get-tough legislation on the issue as contributing to its midterm election losses.

Conservative lawmakers not only stopped Bush's guest worker plan in Congress this year, but they passed a law calling for 700 miles of fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border. Bush signed the legislation in the waning days of the campaign in hopes of galvanizing conservative voters.

But the move failed to save several Republican candidates who had called for an illegal-immigration crackdown. And exit polls suggested that many Latinos abandoned the GOP as a reaction to rhetoric that they viewed as negative toward all immigrants, legal and illegal.

Martinez demonstrated Tuesday that he would not shy away from the vision of immigration laws that he and Bush had long supported. Emerging from his White House meeting with the president, he told reporters that his party struck the wrong tone on immigration during the election, a tone he promised to change. "Border security only, enforcement only, harshness only, is not the message that I believe America wants to convey," he said.

Martinez, 60, whose full name is Melquiades Rafael Martinez, fled Cuba at age 15 with assistance from a program that helped children leave the communist country. He lived with foster families until he was reunited with his family four years later.

A trial lawyer, he was the elected chairman of Orange County, Fla., and was later chosen by Bush to be housing secretary. In 2004, he became the first Cuban American to be elected to the Senate.

Latino leaders and Republican strategists said elevating Martinez's profile could rebuild goodwill among minority voters.

"You take a Hispanic senator who happens to be Catholic, and that's a direct response to a community that happens to be disappointed," said Al Cardenas, a former chairman of the Republican Party of Florida who, like Martinez, was born in Cuba but moved to the U.S. to flee Fidel Castro.

The Rev. Luis Cortes Jr., founder of the influential Philadelphia-based ministry Esperanza USA, who has been courted by the White House over the last six years, said Martinez's selection made an important statement to conservatives who had backed strict proposals, such as one that would have made it a felony to help illegal immigrants.

"A lot of the Republican candidates chose immigration as the wedge issue, and polls seem to bear out that it was an error for them to do that," Cortes said. "And I think Mel Martinez, because of his life story, is a perfect person to help them find their way back from that era."

White House political director Sara Taylor said Martinez could "communicate with the fastest-growing population in a way they can relate to."

She added that he would prove crucial in building Latino support in a post-Bush era. "We've seen in the last election that the president's popularity [with Latinos] is not transferable to House and Senate candidates," Taylor said.

Martinez will remain in the Senate. He won his seat there in 2004, after the White House urged him to run.

GOP strategists said Martinez would help build support for the party in Florida, a 2008 battleground state.

Martinez said he would remain neutral in the Republican presidential primaries, though he appeared during this year's campaign with one leading contender, Arizona Sen. John McCain, after they both endorsed Florida Gov.-elect Charlie Crist in his primary.

Even with Republicans soon to be in the minority on Capitol Hill, there is no assurance that an immigration overhaul package will pass. The Democrats preparing to take power in the House and Senate are also struggling with their approach to the issue.

Democratic leaders are trying to balance their desire to woo Latino voters with concerns from some labor leaders that new immigration laws would lead to lower wages.

Moreover, some in the party fear that passing a guest worker program and pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants would leave Democrats vulnerable to being portrayed as soft on illegal immigration.

*

peter.wallsten@latimes.com

nicole.gaouette@latimes.com

*

Begin text of infobox

Republican share of the Latino vote:

35% - Bush in 2000

44% - Bush in 2004

30% - House in 2006

Source: CNN exit poll