Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (310811)	11/15/2006 9:59:20 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1572719

Oswald could have killed Kennedy by himself maybe, if he was very lucky to have gotten off the perfect shot or two, but it is highly unlikely. What Oswald was totally incapable of was silencing himself, silencing all other witnesses, covering up, destroying evidence, and staging the guilty verdict on himself before there was any investigation. Do you realize that newspapers in Australia had the "Oswald is guilty" story before Oswald was even arrested? and who faked the photo of Oswald holding up the communist newspaper? This was a fix and a conspiracy. And it's naive to believe it wasn't. At least that it's 95% probable that it was a conspiracy. Just as it is naive that Sirhan or Ray acted alone. Like as the LA Coroner said, RFK was killed by two shooters from two different directions. They covered that up too. And James Earl Ray has a long story about how he was contacted by a shadowy CIA type to set up the assassination. The Wallace shooting also fits into this whole general area of very dubious lone nut theories. The only ones I believe are the Reagan shooting and the Lennon shooting. Both were easy for a lone gunman to pull off with pedestrian knowledge.