SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gersh Avery who wrote (4858)11/15/2006 11:37:33 PM
From: Gersh Avery  Respond to of 10087
 
I think that today we are past the point of deciding if pot has legitimate medical uses.

It does .. period.

The next issue is how does the federal government turn about without losing face? The US government has invested a lot into the anti-pot fight.

Once that issue has been resolved then we move to the next:

Where and how do these medical users get their supplies?



To: Gersh Avery who wrote (4858)11/16/2006 1:10:50 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10087
 
If you have a medical condition that a doctor would write a prescription for, I see no reason you shouldn't be allowed to use it for medical purposes. I'd support changing the law to allow that.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News