SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kevin Rose who wrote (14737)11/16/2006 11:55:04 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
Embryos are cells that are alive, but if they're not going to be fertilized and gestated

Embryos are fertilized. Before fertilization you don't have embryos you have sperm and ova.



To: Kevin Rose who wrote (14737)11/16/2006 12:08:02 PM
From: ManyMoose  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71588
 
Embryos are fertilized and have all the genes necessary for an entire human being if implanted.



To: Kevin Rose who wrote (14737)11/16/2006 1:43:03 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
"There is certainly no 'killing and processing' of babies to extract embryonic stem cells. None whatsoever."

I believe the dispassionate term is extract (or harvest). They extract the cells. So if you extract my heart for transplanting into another human without my consent while I am alive would that qualify as 'killing and processing' or would it just be extracting?

"Embryos are cells that are alive"

They are a complete genetic blueprint for a human. They result from an ovum being fertilized by spermatozoa (human embryos). In the case of adult stem cells, harvesting or extracting them does not generally result in the termination of further growth as an independent organism.