SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gersh Avery who wrote (4977)11/18/2006 10:54:56 AM
From: Jim S  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 10087
 
"Supply is a real issue today in CA. SanFransisco hired a guy to produce starter plants for the medical marijuana clinics.

The Federal government arrested him. During his trial, the jury was not allowed to hear that he had been hired by the city. After the trial eight of the twelve said they would have voted "not guilty" if they had known about it."

I wouldn't argue that this did happen, but I wonder HOW it could have happened. In any trial, a person is allowed to take the stand in his own defense, and regardless of any judge's order, could "let it slip" that he was hired by a local gov't. At worst, it would result in a mistrial. At best, it would get the facts of the case before the jury.



To: Gersh Avery who wrote (4977)11/18/2006 12:34:15 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10087
 
It ain't working out that way.

The vast majority of Americans believe that my doctor should be able to write me a prescription for it. The Federal government says he shouldn't be able to.


That's because of the stupidity of the medical marijuana advocates. If the advocates of medical marijuana (which we agree a majority is ok with) did a better job of separating their cause from total legalization for everyone, they'd probably succeed.