Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Uranium Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TheSlowLane who wrote (4139)	11/19/2006 7:55:22 PM
From: Chuckles_Bee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30223

"Fuel costs make up 24 percent of the overall production costs of nuclear power plants." ...or at least so says this site: Costs: Operating / Building / Waste Disposal nei.org ...but that is the total fuel cost, not just U3O8, which has to be processed, enriched and fabricated. This site shows the breakdown of the total fuel cost: The Economics of Nuclear Power uic.com.au Regards, CB.

To: TheSlowLane who wrote (4139)	11/19/2006 8:00:25 PM
From: Tommaso	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 30223

In that case, I think we will see uranium at $200 in the next eighteen months. I try to beware of wild speculative pie-in-the-sky mania, but just looking at this cold-bloodedly, arithmetically, I have never seen anything that appeared to me to be as clearly a sure thing as uranium right now. I said in another post today that I don't recall seeing any coverage of uranium in the Wall Street Journal. Have you seen any? They finally did quit sending me free copies so I haven't seen but a few issues in the last several weeks. I think there may have been one or two casual references in Barron's.