Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Done, gone. who wrote (96723)	11/20/2006 12:02:15 PM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Michal - you seem to be obsessed with me and with personal attacks. Is that because you were embarrassed by posting that you, in essence, run SI and, when you didn't get your own way, you pretend to ignore the Adminsitrators and those with whom you disagree? MMG and SLJB are very different stocks. I have a diversified portfolio and I post about many stocks. I bought SLJB at .002's and posted it on the boards. I did not get out at the top. I don't claim to be perfect as you apparently do. There is huge risk in SLJB and I never have indicated that there is the same element of risk OR RETURN in both stocks. Only a moronic generic basher would assume that, or someone with an agenda to personally attack. Nevertheless, there is significant risk in MMG. Perhaps that's why you chose to say that you dumped after it topped and moved back significantly after the AMEX pump. I know you claim to have gotten out at the top in MMG in the 4's but the fact is that it has taken a big hit from the pump that led to the AMEX. Irrespective of the price action, there are many issues, including whether the stock is primarily a mining pump. Please don't feel personally hurt just because the one stock upon which you've had the stones to post is retreating a bit. Best!