Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (8229)	11/30/2006 3:33:47 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Respond to of 36917

That's one place that was [maybe] the warmest in 300 years. What about the other 299 places which weren't the warmest in 300 years? On average, with 300 places, each year they should be able to say "Such and such a place has had the warmest weather in 300 years". With drivel like that article, it's no wonder that Global Warming lacks credibility. When people need absurd reasoning, fraudulent facts and faulty logic to support their argument, my experience is that there isn't much to their position. When people have a good case, they just come straight out with the facts which are obvious and convincing. They certainly don't need to be dishonest. Mqurice