SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mary Cluney who wrote (89380)11/20/2006 8:05:17 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 362641
 
Mary: I don't think Hillary can win...She's bright (but polarizing) and would be better off replacing Reid in the next few years as Senate Majority Leader.

The Dems have had a tough time learning that you put the SALESMAN at the top of the ticket and the Bureaucrat at the bottom. Best foot forward, as they say.

A combination like Edwards/Kerry could have won in 2004. Likewise Obama/Clark (for his foreign policy experience) in 2008 would be the right way to do it – or shall I say, the way the right-wing would do it, and win. They understand marketing, sales, and how to win many of the big elections. But not the Dems: both Edwards and Obama are too new and too thin on experience to allow Serious Democrats to put them at the top of the ticket...we hear this way too often.

I should note here that the Republicans didn’t let Shrub’s complete lack of experience keep them from putting him on the top of the ticket. He’s a good politician, connected with people, and was a damn good salesman. He was smooth and he sold well. They knew that all their experienced, “serious” old-hands were electoral losers: the Bob Dole types. And so they did the smart thing: THEY KEPT THEM OUT OF THE RACE. So, why wouldn’t we put an Obama or an Edwards up there, and let him pick a Clark or a Feingold for the VP to deal with the Beltway? People who have natural charisma, charm, and “star power” win elections. Bill “Elvis” Clinton had that from the get-go. Obama has it at a level I’ve never seen in a politician.

-s2@JustMyView.com



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (89380)11/21/2006 12:30:12 PM
From: techguerrilla  Respond to of 362641
 
"Obama's only obstacle to the Presidency is that he is too in experienced." .....

.......... I'll take brains over experience any day of the week.

/john