Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Uranium Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tommaso who wrote (4218)	11/21/2006 2:55:22 PM
From: kidl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30205

"I have never heard before of grades of uranium above 50%." Neither have I. Fantastic, nearly "unbelievable" results.

To: Tommaso who wrote (4218)	11/21/2006 6:10:31 PM
From: terry101	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30205

UEX recovery... I noticed that it is "30 metres ABOVE the unconformity." That is a significant advantage to being at (or below) the unconformity. Good news! Tomasso, I thought I also recall reading in the CCJ annual report that they have an option to increase their position in UEX to around 50%. I'll try to get some time tonight to look it back up. Best, Terry

To: Tommaso who wrote (4218)	11/22/2006 7:14:02 PM
From: energyplay	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30205

High uranium grades - If I remeber correctly, the grades are express as percentages of U3O8, (the actual yellowcake). Some deposits have UO2, which is a black mineral. So a moderte amount of UO2 would result in very high values of U3O8 I think the MiVida mine (Charlie Steen's discovery) had UO2, which is one reason it was not recognized. Some of the "roll deposits" have a reducing environment. There is one extremely rich NATURAL deposit in Niger which would go critical when the water table was right. uraniumminerals.com