SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rzborusa who wrote (217291)11/21/2006 1:49:36 PM
From: DRBESRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
i have wondered about CMW yields



To: rzborusa who wrote (217291)11/21/2006 1:57:40 PM
From: dougSF30Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Pru's analyst had already placed his bets on long AMD / short INTC, and been utterly wrong, so don't believe everything you read from him. :)

Message 22474695

$65 target for AMD in *May*. Still at, what, $40 or something crazy?

They blew their INTC call for Q3, too:

Message 22693753

This guy is the anti-Mosesmann.



To: rzborusa who wrote (217291)11/21/2006 2:39:10 PM
From: dougSF30Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Its hard to see the impetus for a rush to 45nm when they can't keep the fabs full at 65.

It is?

45nm = lower power and higher performance

What better way for Intel to crush AMD than to increase their perf, perf/W, and perf/W/$ advantage?

Look at those Wolfdale specs-- this is a "mainstream" part:

57W @ 3.5-4.0GHz x 2 "Core 2" cores.

vr-zone.com