Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (217392)	11/22/2006 7:46:52 AM
From: seti	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Of course I have to panic! You certainly do - about your Intel investment.

To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (217392)	11/22/2006 7:58:34 AM
From: niceguy767	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Speaking of social experiments...just exactly what is that you guys don't get about the $16 INTC call released yesterday... Pretty transparent analysis given by these guys as to how they arrived at their INTC = $16 analysis, and rather than attack the assumptions of these analysts, the usual INTC tactic of attacking the messenger ensued...Social predictability in this social experiment. Anyway, it's pretty obvious that the Dell turnaround is consistent with the timing of their new AMD offerings... Hmmm...Wonder if the anticipated H1 INTC margin problem cited in yesterday's INTC = $16 analysis is a result of INTC taking a hit on margins in effort to compete with AMD ASP's now that the Dell monopolistic hold has been broken? Oh yeah, I forgot...there was no monopolistic hold ;-)

To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (217392)	11/22/2006 8:37:41 AM
From: j3pflynn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Sarmad - You're sounding a little shrill. Agreed that Dell didn't explicitly say AMD helped them raise their financial performance, but you have to work just as hard and be just as supposedly "dishonest" as the "AMD fanboys" to say they didn't mean it that way. Perhaps you ought to get a Federal grant and take your little "social experiment" elsewhere. Though, even in the land of "pork", I suspect you'd have problems getting funding.