Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (311734)	11/22/2006 11:38:35 AM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577893

True. But slow and steady doesn't help much if there isn't much movement to be proactive. And if you are being proactive, you might as well consider addressing the cause of the problem. Its much cheaper and easier to make a new variant of a tomato, or other crops, or even to shift some production to new areas, then it is to greatly reduce CO2 emissions. Some foods do indeed do better in warmer weather, and also plants may do better with higher CO2. Sufficiently slow and steady will allow for natural and artificial changes in crops. Fast dramatic change will not, but if we are facing such a dramatic changes our efforts to cut back CO2 are probably going to fall woefully short, even if you get people like me to think more like Al Gore about the issue.