Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (13296)	11/23/2006 4:40:44 PM
From: LTK007	Respond to of 22250

I need respond with a not yet done convoluted ratiocination, but i am getting hungry:) But i will say i attack subjects with two basic tools, one ratiocination and the other intuition. The ratiocinating process is there to put my intuitive processing under constant oversight. And that is how i would approach your suggestion. Can i just like that reject your idea of a "plausible hypothesis"? No, not until i put it through the "wringer" of the process i mention above, and see IF it can be rejected. i will put into "this is somthing to ponder" as i go to sleep. i don't count sheep to go to sleep , i ponder myself into sleep(VBG:) max

To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (13296)	11/23/2006 4:49:18 PM
From: sea_urchin	Respond to of 22250

Crimson > Bin Laden and much of the Al Queda network worked closely with the CIA to oust the Russians from Afghanistan during the 1980s. teamliberty.net >>“The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.” Surprised by the ease in which this FBI spokesman made such an astonishing statement, I asked, “How this was possible?” Tomb continued, “Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11.” I asked, “How does that work?” Tomb continued, “The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice than decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, Bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connected Bin Laden to 9/11.”<< > Rogue pro-Zionist US intelligence operatives COULD well have encouraged the 9/11 attack ... But the suspicion for an "inside job" goes further than that. Much further. For a start, who put explosives in the WTC? -- and don't tell me this was not a MASSIVE explosion. 911research.wtc7.net (PS. I'm talking about the BIG explosion, not the puff where the arrow points)