Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: shortsinthesand who wrote (689)	11/24/2006 9:09:09 AM
From: rrufff	Respond to of 1681

Your post is off topic and I believe a violation of SI Dave's prior request. This board is not supposed to be about me and I know he has removed one of your prior posts. However, as you persist in posting, here are your answers. 1. Aliass - my posts speak for themselves. I've been consistent from my purchases at .002's. Your buddies in bash have analyzed each and every one of my posts, even though many pretend to ignore them. If there were inconsistencies, they would have been spammed here I'm sure. If you have a question about a specific post, please advise. I saw that one of my earliest posts was spammed by a wormie basher. As I re-read it, it seemed to be true and objective both when it was posted and rings true today. It speaks about the inherent risks in the company and in pinkie investing. It also explores the potential returns that would be available if the company's PR'd potential turned out to be true. The basher seemed to miss the points made, but given his blind hatred and history of personal attacks, which have gotten him booted from legit message boards many times, any potential audience impact has likely backfired. 2. With respect to the IHub board, despite lies about me by the cowardly NASD suspended and fined worm, I am probably the least active assistant there. I cover about 100 stocks and don't have the time to read more than a fraction of the posts over the past couple of months. It sounds as if you know more or spend more time there with your anal ysis than I do. I suggest you go to that board and ask the moderator who is a fine person in my opinion your questions. From what I've seen, almost all of the removed posts fall into the categories of spam, lies, personal attacks or vulgarities. There have also been many multiple aliases booted from IHub. I know that Ian Brown was booted after threatening the owners of IHub and at that time he was already in the IHub jail. The wormie leader of the pro bashers has not denied that this is one of his multiple aliassses. You have to ask why supposed good samaritans will break rules and lie just to bash around the clock. Clearly this is an extremely high risk stock and one which the former CEO has hurt by providing ammunition for professional and perhaps paid bashers. One has to wonder why these bashers post around the clock about posters rather than the company, why they break rules and make up multiple aliassses in attempts to further their mission. 3. As for bans, I have not asked Matt for any ban. You may not know but moderators or assistants can not ban posters on IHub unlike on SI. Feel free to speak to the owners of IHub for your answers. In going over the list quickly, I do see at least one "bullish" poster who was banned. I believe his name is scorpio. I don't recognize most of the other names. Again, I suggest you speak to Matt rather than post off topic here. As to the sheer numbers, I don't know but it may be small in terms of the huge numbers of readers on that board. It is by far and away I think the most book marked board. So, it should not be surprising that it attracts the most people who seem to want to break the rules set up by this private website and sister of SI. Have a good one.