Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Diamond Play Cafi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: james flannigan who wrote (4815)	11/24/2006 3:17:15 PM
From: james flannigan	Respond to of 16206

I guess the market is confirming the value present at GK.Looks like $5 bucks is around the corner.The more we argue the value of GK,the higher the price seems to go.We may see a lot of people get madder if the stock were to pass the ten yr high of $6.00. It will be nice when Debeers makes its move on MPV.Then we shall all see the value,and it will stop the argument (sorry I mean debate).A new topic will the have to be found.We had all these debates about Winspear,and whoo hoo Debeers took all of our fun away one day at $5.00. Have a great weekend all. James

To: james flannigan who wrote (4815)	11/24/2006 5:07:42 PM
From: WillP	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 16206

Shore, assures me below $10.Now that sounds like a forecast to me, for someone who don't like forecasts you seem to think its ok to take that to the bank. James, you either don't comprehend what you read very well, or you're just funnin' with me. What I wrote, of course, was: "Shore also assures me its operating costs will be less than $10 per tonne, which would be about one-sixth what is predicted for Gahcho Kue. I have a hard time believing that, but it was likely one of those doctors that you swoon over that came up with the figure, so who am I to quibble. [grin]" Yes, it is a forecast, but not my forecast. Further, I have concerns about its accuracy. I won't put it unqualified in a post, much less take it to the bank. But when I post topics that Evans and I talk about,your thoughts are "well evans is CEO of MPV and is going to paint the best picture" (not your exact words,just the meaning). No, they're not my exact words, although they do match closely with what others have said. I would never fault any company head for presenting his best pitch to investors. In fact, I think they should. I see a double standard here.At any rate we can agree to disagree,and that makes for good debate.I guess there will always be two forces at work, half full,half empty.You know that I see it half full (GRINNNNN) James If you reread my posts about Shore, you'll se no double standard. I hold them to the same standards I will Gahcho Kue. With regard to the operating costs in Saskatchewan, I continue to press for details. Our only disagreement is whether it is prudent to tout the best case scenarios today for a mine that won't start to produce diamonds until 2011. That didn't work so well for Tahera. There are clear benefits to underpromising and overdelivering. Regards, WillP