Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scion who wrote (706)	11/24/2006 3:41:07 PM
From: scion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1681

Whether the Windsor Star's article angered you or intrigued you, I suggest to you that it still reflects the fundamental problem facing all of SLJB's shareholders: a distinct lack of transparency in the company. Posted by: honanboss In reply to: None Date:11/24/2006 3:31:02 PM Post #of 191379 All, I have avoided this page largely today to avoid any negative responses to my name and our efforts being referred to in the Windsor Star in connection with the SAM's story. Let me make it clear that I had nothing to do with the SAM's part of the story. I spoke to the Windsor Star to try to gain publicity and support for our initiative to organize 15% of shareholders of SLJB to be in a position to be able to demand access to SLJB's records. And I am writing this post now for the same purpose. Whether the Windsor Star's article angered you or intrigued you, I suggest to you that it still reflects the fundamental problem facing all of SLJB's shareholders: a distinct lack of transparency in the company. The fact is, we know little about the company other than what can be derived from press releases and a few phone calls. I am trying to organize us to take advantage of a provision of Nevada law that allows a shareholder (or a group of shareholders) who own 15% of shares of a company to demand access to the books and records of a company. We presently have 166 shareholders representing 48 million shares in support of this plan. I assure you that even if we do reach 75 million shares, we will not exercise this power haphazardly. We will only do it if Steve Sulja, as Petar V. did before, makes bold assertions or statements and fails to deliver on them. It is my stated preference and hope to not have to rely on this measure, but until such time as SLJB provides transparency to us, we should be in a position to force, if we have to. If you support this plan, please email me at sljbfinancials@gmail.com. At this stage, I only require your name and shareholdings. Once we get close to 75 million shares, I will post an authorization that will need to be signed and returned to me. At that point, we will be in a position to act if we have to. I reiterate, only if we have to. Thanks, HB investorshub.com