Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Diamond Play Cafi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bloomfield who wrote (4830)	11/25/2006 8:27:29 PM
From: James Bone	Respond to of 16206

Propaganda, brain washing, scare technique We all know that from the history Nazi Germany, Soviet Union, etc Putting good examples on internet Lord Black. What is for you about bashing? Patrick Evans is very good CEO, I saw him personally. He made impression of honest person. I like him. Put your real name in front of board, and see if any shareholders can lunch class action lawsuit against you in the event, if your opinion are wrong and for wrong doing against CEO and management of MPV. Why you dont put name of people,who benefit it from investing in diamond sector,Winspear,Dia Met. Yes,Winspear are not the best example. How those minority shareholders from Ekati mine became so wealthy. You are trying your best to scare investors. I would not be surprise,if you are not one of the buyers of MPV Every day a few shareholders are selling their shares. Average shareholder will not hold shares more than 6 months,not all of them. That is why MPV is traded on small volume, because of most of those shares are hold in strong hands. Yes,you can poison,kill and create situation for a few people to keep mouth closed, recent example in London. Some investigation are already on the go in the scenario with poisoning,including shareholders. You and those behind you been watch now. West is a democratic country. I said too much already. The writing is on the wall... Warm wishes to bashers

To: Bloomfield who wrote (4830)	11/25/2006 8:32:53 PM
From: WillP	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 16206

Bloomfield: You can decide there is a flaw in my conclusion -- which is merely an opinion, but not in my reasoning through the various facts and calculations regarding the diamond values, which are clear. Someone called upon to defend the Salman report might do so as follows: #1. The WWW appraised diamond values for the eastern lobe of 5034 was $133 (U.S.) per carat. That subparcel contained a single large stone that accounted for more than half the value. #2. The other subparcels contained no such stones. Most analysts and modellers conclude the diamond value in the eastern lobe is too high, but an alternative hypothesis is that the samples from the other lobes and pipes were too small to produce a meaningful number of valuable diamonds. As a result, larger tests from those areas would yield a much higher diamond value. (In fact, that has been a common refrain from many of the Mountain Province shareholders.) #3. Mining will start in 5034 and continue there for about five years at least. The higher diamond values come form that pipe. The Salman spreadsheet terminates before the lower diamond values in Hearne and Tuzo work their way into the mine plan. I could see a CEO saying, 'Umm,yeah. Sure. You could be right,' in response to an analyst making the case for a markedly higher diamond value than currently modelled. I think Mountain Province and De Beers have done a good job of putting forth reasonable estimates of the projected Gahcho Kue economics. Regards, WillP