Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Diamond Play Cafi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: debvan who wrote (4833)	11/26/2006 2:07:33 AM
From: WillP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16206

Debvan: Yes, I'm aware of that. I suspect you point it out as proof the Gahcho Kue pipes do contain more than one valuable diamond. I have no problem accepting that, based on the data. In my previous post, I was trying to present a hypothetical argument that would support the position that the value of Gahcho Kue would increase because of the presence of valuable stones like the one in 5034. Saying there was one such stone present in the Hearne parcel and the appraised value was still low does not help that argument -- it helps Bloomfield's. There would be some reason to exclude the Hearne stone -- objections from Bloomfield and me notwithstanding -- because the Hearne diamond was worth a bit less than half thevalue of the 5034 diamond. Regards, WillP